Sample: Banquo as Foil
(Plot1)
Alice Wong, student in English L315, Spring 95
Banquo has a very similar background to Macbeth's and is initially faced with the
same dilemma--whether or not to act on his private desires and thoughts. The
similarities of these men's lives provide a good platform to discuss their behaviors. The
differences between their choices of how to act illuminate the extremeness of
Macbeth's actions to the norm of a Scottish warrior.
When the two warriors meet the three Weird sisters, they both receive prophecies of
a promising future. Macbeth, who is already Thane of Glamis, is to be Thane of Cawdor
and then King. Banquo is promised a line of kings from his family. They are somewhat
skeptical at the witches' prophecies, thinking they might have been hallucinations
caused by eating an "insane root/That takes the reason prisoner" (1.3.87-88).
However, one of Macbeth's prophecies immediately becomes true: He becomes Thane
of Cawdor. This acts as a verification of the Weird sisters' soothsaying powers.
Banquo ponders for a bit on their words while Macbeth rushes back to his wife and
begins to imagine how the other prophecies might come true. In this way, Banquo
chooses a path guided by reasoning, while Macbeth's guiding force seems to be his
own greed and excitement. Also, while Lady Macbeth plays an integral role in swaying
Macbeth's rationale, Banquo does not have a similar counterpart.
This difference perhaps demonstrates the impact two people conspiring together can have compared to one person thinking about conspiring. While the latter is imagining, the former is stimulating the other's desires for their common goal/
Banquo is also far less devious than Macbeth. In Act 2, scene1, Banquo openly admits
to Macbeth he had dreamed and thought about the Weird sisters' prophecies.
Macbeth, already in the midst of preparations for Duncan's murder, denies thinking
about them at all,
Banquo: All's well
I dreamt last night of the three weird sisters.
To you they have showed some truth.
Macbeth: I think not of them
Yet, when we can entreat an hour to serve,
We would spend it in some words upon that business,
If you would grant me the time. (2.1.24-32)
Banquo is just as curious as the next man about good prphecies coming true, but he
does not go beyond the point of dreaming and pondering. The overall difference in
Banquo and Macbeth is that Banquo remains an honorable and loyal nobleman,
although intrigued by the thought of his sons becoming kings. Whether the prophecies
will become true or not for him, he takes no aggressive actions to aid the prophecy.
Macbeth's weak explanation for killing the guards would have garnered deep
suspicion and a beginning look of distrust from Banquo. Macbeth had ceased
performing as a loyal warrior should. Instead, he is concerned with his own ambitions
solely and is willing to kill others, his closest allies, to guarantee his throne's security,
For them the gracious Duncan have I murdered,
Put rancors in the vessel of my peace
Only for them, and mine eternal jewel
Given to the common enemy of man
To make them kings, the seeds of Banquo kings.
Rather than so , come fate into the list,
And champion me to th' utterance. (3.1.71-77)
Macbeth is compelled to murder his trusted friend Banquo and his son in order to prevent another prophecy of the three Weird sisters from coming true. At this point, Macbeth's character barely resembles the initially skeptical Macbeth in 1.3 when he first heard the prophecies. Macbeth is consumed with the insecurities and paranoia that comes with immense power, which undoubtedly affects his judgments and perspective. Banquo becomes increasingly suspicious of Macbeth yet retains his honor and moral code throughout the play. In this sense, Banquo is the ideal foil figure in that he effectively demonstrates a divergent path from the main character while faced with similar challenges and decisions. History bears out the benefits of such moral actions by recording the royal line that came from Banquo.